The Bruce Lee approach

Bruce Lee are for many the guy that kicked every ass on screen in the 70´s.
He also developed an approach to martial arts called JKD.

I simply name it a no non sense approach.
For me the modeling aspect of NLP is the key component in what I do.
However, I dont use what people might think is the NLP modeling, I use the Bruce Lee approach.

For me as I done this modeling project for the last 5 years, what become obvious is the when doing and as I done it, I also gain access to the how to do it in a different way, and using this new found knowledge I update what I do based on previous finds.
Now, what I update from are however, not just based on previous experiences.
I update from the projection and calculation of a future orientation or frame.

Lets say you need to make a decision, due to some things that goes on in the marketplace.
Are you going to do the decision, based on what has happen up to this point, or the current situation as it is, or maybe we can view this from how we want things to be.
Creating the future, even when the situation calls for more limited choices in decsions are the framework of NLP.

The founders of NLP said, we like the client to have more choices due to them having limited choices, since they got the problems and current thinking/behaviours.
So, how do we create more choices, that is NOT built upon the past and current situation?

There are one way we can do that, using a future orientation, but how do we do that when we have our current thinking and behaviour as it is?

How do we free us from our own mind?

Our thinking and behaviour has a platform, a way of organize the framework of our current choices.
I call this structural cognitive orientation.
This orientation are based on our own brain creating structural elements in our own brain to map the relations between different categories of information.

The basis of NLP with our five senses which are our current input we have consistently, we get all kinds of different input from our senses, this was also the basis of NLP and its development with the found of people using predicates of senses to show the cognitive orientation they used.
I see what you mean, and I feel what your saying and I listen carefully to what you say.
As people use such predicates NLP mapped that with language as the meta-model to produce a sequence that people use as in the NLP strategy model.
However, we also use different ways to organize ourselves than what fits into a NLP strategy, by just the idea of 3 steps in any NLP strategy to be effective, we can map several more steps when people use their mind to produce a result.

The question for me are, how do we access and elicit a peak performance state, where we can do amazing things, and how does our brain know when we do that?
What are the cues, and structure behind such amazing peak performances?

Using NLP requries skill, in fact so much skill I rarely meet people proficient in NLP to a degree which I would like to see. I have high quality standards.
I see the NLP tranings produce less qualified NLP practitioners which seldom are trained properly to be able to do NLP.
However, they are great in running a program of applying x technique for a particular problem.
However, the skill to decide what to do, based on the clients map of the world, is seldom practised and those skills are not as good as I would like people to be using NLP.

So, as I did the modeling and used a non sense approach, I had to re-set and re-write what I did since what I had to come up with was a simplistic approach, that when done and used would allow a particular result to happen exactly the same way each and every time, no matter the problem the client or group might have.
This would mean you be using a precise framework to achive the same result each and every time.
That would cut down the skill people need due to using the same approach each and every time, the framework of that would allow a result to be the same each and every time.
Similiar to a driving license, you need some theory, some practice and a test to achive a licence to get the skill to drive a car.
Then you able to drive the car, and you can only get better due to not having to learn everything to create a car, design a car, you just drive the car.

This was my aim here, to have a model to produce the same result, which also would mean, that a lot of the NLP models, needs to be updated and or removed.

The failure and flaw of NLP are that after 30 years, little innovation is done in NLP.
We add more features, and add more to the phenomena and basically our brain is the same as it was 40.000 tousand years ago.

Why do we need more to describe the brain and how we use it?

Wouldnt it be optimum if we found out how our brain works as it create the display we have as in our thinking, feeling and our behaviour?
If we knew that, wouldnt that allow us to produce a exact result each and every time due to we know the framework our brain use to produce the results?

Do our brain use complicated things?
No, it uses domain rules, a cell send x amount of info, we can say, well it uses neurochemicals, and electricity to do so, we use decoding stufff and so on but again, we dont need to know how that works to be able to replicate a result.
Same as the car, you dont need to know everything, you know, gas/fuel, keys, driver license.
The rest, just hopefully works.

As I done this model and built it, testing it trough numerous testing allows me to build a testing platform to map, do the model produce the same result each and every time?
If yes. I am done

And the result is, it does.

/Robert Johansson
Before and after Robert