Why I stopped doing NLP and Hypnosis and why you should to!

In the story in search for enlightment someone said "first you chop wood and carry water, then you enter the path and journey and then the chop wood and carry water isnt the same anymore and when your enlighted then again you chop wood and carry water."

I stopped doing NLP when I was lucky enough to be exposed to the work of Joseph Riggio. I used my skills from NLP to model down him and the result has been a model about that. I am not trained in the mythoself model and has not recived special training in that model.

I have however had some exposures in some specific training content Joseph has done one was the initial event in denmark 2003 where he demonstrating the “designer swish pattern” a positive consideration and way different than NLP does it and then a seminar in 2004 where he did the wealth attraction seminar. I then have been training and also been invited by Joseph to teach in his own classes most recently in Mohonk dec 2004.

I also lately stopped doing hypnosis and along with NLP I stopped doing what I been trained by one of the founders of NLP Richard Bandler and also other trainers along the way.

Why I stopped doing NLP and hypnosis was of the fact of what I learned by Joseph Riggio worked so much better.

There is also this which I argue for in regards to changework either it be NLP or hypnosis or for that matter any other method of choice when we regard changework.

The point are,
There is the issue and problem of an inhibitory state of experience i.e. any belief, value or as such with a cause-effect of a Complex eqvivalence is coming from a inhibitory state, a representation of something else.
In essence anything humans are representing is a problem or an inhibitory state which if accepted i.e that there is an issue or problem only keep the merry go round with the current level of interventions.
If you do six step reframing as in NLP you cant trust the unconsious to provide you with the proper signals, since they be distorted by the same consious mind that set the limitation that now needs to be adding choices to. If you use hypnosis to bypass the consious signals to talk directly to the unconsious the same principle applies, the unconsious mind is not to be trusted since the signals given are programmed by the indviduals own patterns and then can only display the same limitation and the adding choices will still keep the issue or problem present it now just have more choices.

When any change work, it is the result of making the old problem or issue non existent. It simply cease to exist for the individual.
However, that intervention have not taught the individual to access or do new patterns, thinking or use new strategies in the daily life.

NLP is all about representations and the words attached to those, where we can track, map any links that the cause-effect and the complex eqvivalence are the source of.
NLP then is all about limitations since before that area of NLP there has to be a somatic expression and before that a somatic presence.

Those that knows the riggio model also knows this, that a exciatory state and whats working will if elicited from the somatic markers produce a fully different approach to life.

In essence any problem the individual ever had or will have, simply ceases to exist!

If your tired of fixing problems and using such methods then join the revolution of accessing what works now and what will work for you into the future.

If your asking yourself or me that, "am I saying that all NLP and hypnosis and any other method of change that adress "a problem or issue or the similiar" is NOT needed at all with this approach your suggesting?"

Yes!

This is in essence the same message Joseph Riggio has talked about.

If the somatic expression is elicited from at your best or as I do it, from the being human then anything else can be consider not needed since from that somatic expression there is no problems existing, in that somatic presence of "being human" then no problems exists at all.
If we then add a sorting out program and base that on what we identify with, we then can choose any direction to go with our expereince of life. If you elicit the template of your best and use that with being human and then add, "whats working" as criteria then you get a powerful system that will set a direction of positive excitment since the neurology are positivly charged.
But it dosnt stopp there, we can add any expereince and alter it based on a moment of moment notice and truly expereince a trancending expereince in each waking moment if we so activly choose.

Why I stopped doing NLP and hypnosis was of the flaw that NLP and also hypnosis and aso any other method of change is using as a presupposition that there are problems or issues.

If we ask this question,
do you by any chance have conflicts within you?
If you do that is beacuse of the limitations of representations and contextual markers (Anchors) within different contexts inside your mind.

Using the template of the riggio model or the mythoself model those conflicts will not be possible to experience.
You be free to express yourself being human at your best in any context.

This happens since you be able to decide and use freely what expereince you want to expereince either in specific contexts or as general you can imagine.

When people enter my trainings I simply say, if you have issues, problems or conflicts etc.. that here you dont need to work on them ever, or accept them or balance them out unless you would want to for some odd reason.
As people get this concept they stop working with problems, they thought they had or any issues they once think they had since they now would know differently.

I then use a somatic expression first before I do NLP and hypnosis and then I chop wood and carry water as it is.

Join the (R)evolution and express yourself at your best!

Your best

/Robert Johansson
Modeller of the riggio model.

The Riggio Model project!

Finnaly, its done.

Whats done? a voice in the crowd asks curiously.

The modeling project of Joseph Riggio.

oh that...the voice keeps his attnetion on other matters like food.

Still whatever the voices are saying or not that the project is done, I do now have a model down, a project taking 2 and a half years, me spending that to grasp what Joseph was doing.
I am about to publish articles about this project which can be read at www.rigggiomodel.biz and at the riggiomodel yahoo group list.

For me this is an evolution and also extends into beyound that.
For me personally this project have changed how I do things and also how I teach since the presence of this model requires people to not just be who they are a old classic and some say worth nothing since people been saying that for ages.

Be who you are.

But how?

The Riggio model offers people a "somatic how to" elicit just that, who you are.
Then to build upon that setting up a sorting system before any cognitive organization occours in many ways a re-design of how you think and make decisions.
Then we can build upon that to make the life living as you would like with intentions and reaching for goals and outcomes you would like to experience.

In the time for the last 2 and a half years I been into a little loop, the modeling loop I call it, and now I came out of it the model was done.
Kind of fun if you ask me, just do the initial modeling then a model just sits there all done.
However the time spent before that testing and checking and doing all kinds of tests just to get there is where the fun is..at least if you ask me.

My oncle leif said that he was suprised I didnt want to build the inside of the summer house, I said, I enjoyed the outside so much more, building a house from the ground up to watch it come alive with walls and floors. The internal decoration even if fun was not for me.
I noted however that if I wanted to build a house on my own that I would need to build the internal decorations also.

The riggio model offers people that. To first set a solid foundation, being you and then to set up before we set the goundwork a elicitation and sorting based on everything else which is the second step.
This is done to teach people about the difference between somatic sense and self and the rest which is thinking, representations and words and cognitive processes.

In essence the distinction between "ontology and epistiomology".
That is crucial to have before we move on.

Another voice in the crowd rises up with a "Crucial to what?" it says with a dumbfounded look on its face.

That the difference between a somatic sense and the cognitive one is crucial to get in expereince and to have no doubt which is which.
Which is important to get since if not then confusion is easy to attain.

Which then resides into expereince and then it becomes obvious and not elusive anymore.

I am just glad its done.

The trainings will now be set of making those distinctions obvious.

Your best

/Robert
www.riggiomodel.biz