Nothing and reality and NLP modelling

Its a chair he said.

Sometimes I like philosophy, talking about what defines a chair is such a thing.

What defines a chair really?

Most would say, a thing you sit on. But that dosnt solve it since you can sit on other things.
The answer comes fast since we rarely if ever try to define what something "is" or what the function is of the thing.
The function of a chair for most is something to sit on.

I guess thats why people often say, "sit on this".

In my line of work I got to define what a chair is, when I do modeling people talks about the function beacuse that is what most people are concern about and what is most obvious. I try to define that and also what a chair "is" really doing there.

Where did that chair idea come from?
What defines a chair with humans trying to logically put it in boxes and categories often refered to logic and its levels.

In the end to sum it up, the sun will blow up one day, its a tragedy, really, and I guess how do science know that our sun will blow up when it havent done so?
I guess its similiar as Carmine Baffa once wrote, if i painted my garage white then I know I painted it white.
That´s what people say, we know what we done unless of course we dont remember it properly but think we are.

So I try my best to define what something is and what it does and narrow it down as much to the smallest common dominator as in NLP said to be a T.O.T.E, a small loop and recursive in nature.
When that loop is found and then practised it allows someone to gain the same skill as someone who does really well in a particular context.
We chunk it down into small bit of information which practised generalized into a wider contextual applied area.

There is pits we can fall into when we do this, is it really this he/she does or have I missed something? The missing is always about refinement, testing the edge of the model since that allow us to find what is missing and needs either to be refined or added to the model.
Or simply state this is this model, now we need to define a new model/reality.

Reality is a nice place to be at. We respond to other peoples reality since we notice people are similiar to us, if we travel to other countires people seems different and I am not talking about the outside, they behave differently which we tend to respond to first unless you have prejudices.

Why people behave differently isnt that important, the thing that is interesting is how come we respond differently?
Its another human being across us.

Joseph Riggio would say we lacked the level of admitting that we didnt identify the other human being as a human being.
We justify then the response we have either by dissmissing it or never notice it.
The question is, why do we respond to something as we do and what makes us respond so?

Nailing such stuff down isnt that easy, often its about knowledge we have about the world, classifed as beliefs about the world which we find natural and sometimes it is about how we in emotions have learned to respond to other human beings that use similiar codes as we do.
Western society, eastern society etc...

We learn at early ages to respond to social rules in what is appropriate behaviour but how we feel about that is rarely talked about, we know how to behave but can feel like shit or be happy or any other emotion.
Behave yourself, havent a lot of kids been promoted to shut up when grown ups talked?

What typically happens we learn a way to respond to other human beings which is coded in early age. We then respond unconsiously, before we think to signals we never or rarely think about or do anything about.

This well mapped out in NLP. an imprint of an early age that we then use as a reference later one, we become as much a duck that follows the first thing we see as our mother. Konrad Lorentz work on ducks and later Robert dilts taking that to human beings isnt the same even though we get imprinted since our brain works that way.

If an event is significant enough we remember it but also we tend to do so by responding in a specific way, we can react defensivly by panic, limitation or run away or we can face it and react with a exciting mind.
I am talking about basic human primitive brain here, where we run away or face things based on the earlier imprinted emotions which are social and cultural estasblished either as "how to behave to fit in" and how we feel about doing that "behaving properly to fit in".

We then have different set of rules, when we are with our familiy, friends, other people as co-workers, politicians and so on...
We change the response accordingly to the context we enter. Then a few dosnt, those that dosnt either are charismatic leaders who just do thier thing or people who are crazy.
Its obvious it then would be natural to become a leader with charisma to do that.

I would however suggest the similiar or the same as Joseph Riggio does that we can "be" the same in any context choosing to stay the same no matter where we enter.
Its about training ourself to respond by the basic foundation of who we are.

Then we add a new difference here, instead of being crazy, what a concept heh? or to become a charismatic leader we can simply be who we are and build upon that.
Then we achive something unique.

We know our roots, we know what we are and what we are and that there is no difference between us as human beings.
Sharing such moments is for people who goes trough the mythoself program a way of becoming human. We are not born human we train ourself to be human.

The choice Joseph Riggio offers people is to get that in his program to become human.
based on what you are not what the society and culture decides you to be.

Then you can enter any other country, meet people knowing your the same human beings on the same fuckin planet in the same fuckin universe and we are as far we know alone at least in the nearest neighbourhood.
If we then add stuff as we are at our best and use that as a starting point then we can make human beings to become a force to recon with that are positivly based in this world.

We can have small skills, as the harddrive you own in your computer, use the computer and the harddrive missplace files all over and you got to clean it up, defragment the harddrive to speed the computer up so it finds the files faster and more efficient.

Human brains works similiar, we fragement ourselfs to bits beacuse we use our perception as the basis for our organization, we classify black and white as either or even those white is a shade of gray and black is another shade of gray and the middle between black and white is the realtionship we know, black and white can only exist if we know there is gray between those colors.
BUT we never talk about it using the middle road.
We use classification, identify with what we know already to be true about other people.

The same applies to chairs, what is a chair really?
1. What is it that allow us to notice the chair as a chair and not a table?
2. What after number 1 is define is the function of that chair?
Most would argue only number 2 is important and rightly so.

Does the car starts when I need it?
Function is more important for us than what something "is".

Therefore we function as human beings out of learned imprints and those needs, it feels we need to have.
We miss out on something, we lack the basics, we then tend to get on a journey to find what we are missing out on, unless of ocurse we are whole doing the things we do, content as it is living our lifes as it is meant to be.
Unless we change that.

I meet people who are lost, missing something and I point them there where they should be and going to based on what they offer me.
It would of course make my life easier if I just said what they should do and then make them do it and fall into the leadership to charge ahead to show them what life is about. But I dont, I dont know more than anyone else out there even though I might know more about a particular subject and know more about how to. That dosnt allow me to decide what is the best action for another human being since they will know whats the best action for them.

When we miss something, think we lack something, we are not having the whole picture at once, we have a fragment of it, we then need to get back into that feeling of being whole, or even the sense of it since a feeling is still often based on what we learned to see and hear.
It is still linked to the old imprints about the world and we got to set it free from that, reformate the harddrive isnt enough, we need a new brain!

If we access the brains basics emotinal sense of position itself to the context, the how we keep balance at all times without using the old system we can re-balance ourself from a standpoint of being whole.
And its the message and promise of the mythoself program.
To become human.

There are naturally other programs that delivers similiar things and promise stuff but as far I seen, that program is the basic thing to get in terms with to get that experience in a systemic way.

When we have the new harddrive in place, we reformate, install the system and boot it up.
Now the harddrive is still going to fragment itself but we know have a whole system in place we notice directly if we are astray, we dosnt wander off since now we have this magnet that holds us on track since we know where we come from.
This system allow us to measure what we do and keep us in line or as Joseph would say, intention to the trajectory of intent into the future position today.

We cant fail with this system.
Its impossible.

Its having a blueprint of a building and to change that we need to rebuild the building and most people who lives in a house will notice that.
It becomes obvious for you now to notice that your on track that your living your life from fullfillment.
Instead of fragments that you need to find somewhere and someone who can offer those fragmented bits for you.

The act of doing "Nothing" to do a lot in essence "everything" to get where you are already in your own future is a format where the picture of the puzzle has been laid out and you have 10 bits to attend to get the puzzle togheter instead of having 10000 bits of a puzzle.
Most would say 10 bits and having the whole picture is easier...

This system is so easy then to have to keep track of where you are, where your going and where you started from since the startpoint is the end point.
The startpoint, the future is the end point also. Then the reference position is about something that have not happen yet but you know it will happen and you are moving towards the actions required to produce that path and you measure it along the way.

This essentially means your creating the future in advance free from limitations imposed on you from cultural and social imprints.

You start out fresh being human first and foremost and then have a system to organize the journey there that might require skills, time and training but you know where your going, you have a purpose and direction.
Most people get confused by the movie Matrix, how come there is a keymaker that just do that, making keys? They identify what they know in the real world, forget it is a movie that are about programs that are run and controlled inside a hallucination created by the matrix.
(6 times btw)

The key difference between those 6 are that Neo is in love with another human being not with humanity and that allow him to go beyound his limitations to sacrifice himself for the greater good, peace for all humans and machines alike.

The bond to another human being often a loved one is more critical to get than the bond to the human race since we have been alinated to other people, countries, foreigners, black, white, red yellow, etc....

We are in a world of diversity.

What to do about it?

Well I get back to it.

Your best

/Robert
www.riggiomodel.biz